comment on

Thanks for the follow up.

However, I'm not sure that editting Config.pm is going to do it, as it already appears to be correct.

P:\test>perl -V
Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 7) configuration:
[...]
  Compiler:
    cc='cl', ccflags ='-nologo -Gf -W3 -MD -Zi -DNDEBUG -O1 -DWIN32 -D
+_CONSOLE -DNO
    optimize='-MD -Zi -DNDEBUG -O1',
[...]
Characteristics of this binary (from libperl):
  Compile-time options: MULTIPLICITY USE_ITHREADS USE_LARGE_FILES
                        USE_SITECUSTOMIZE PERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT
                        PERL_IMPLICIT_SYS
  Locally applied patches:
        ActivePerl Build 813 [148120]
        Iin_load_module moved for compatibility with build 806
        PerlEx hacks for CGI::Carp
        Less verbose ExtUtils::Install and Pod::Find
        instmodsh upgraded from ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.25
        24699 ICMP_UNREACHABLE handling in Net::Ping
        21540 Fix backward-compatibility issues in if.pm
  Built under MSWin32
  Compiled at Jun  6 2005 13:36:37
  @INC:
    c:/Perl/lib
    c:/Perl/site/lib
    .

P:\test>perl -V:cc
cc='cl';

P:\test>perl -MConfig -le"print $Config{'cc'}"
cl

P:\test>cl
Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Standard Compiler Version 13.00.9466 for 80
+x86
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1984-2001. All rights reserved.

usage: cl [ option... ] filename... [ /link linkoption... ]
[download]

And, without making any pretence to understand the whole E::MM / M::I convolutions, I cannot see why I should need to install a fake configuration, when the real one is correct?

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

In reply to Re^7: New Module Announcement: Object::InsideOut by BrowserUk
in thread New Module Announcement: Object::InsideOut by jdhedden

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Syntactic Confectionery Delight
	PerlMonks