No such thing as a small change | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
That's all very logical, except that at the end you seem to have arrived at the situation where you would have an implicit test of a NaN against zero be true? NaN == 0 -> true cannot be right. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In reply to Re^2: NaNs are true (NaN == 0 -> true? Really?)
by BrowserUk
|
|