The stupid question is the question not asked | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
It's maybe slower than fudging, but I have more faith in it. Having called it "fudging", there is actually very sound math sitting behind it. I'm not competent to explain the math, but I can explain my testing. I've run all permutations of M & N from 1 through 10,000; and 500 million random selections of M & N = 1 .. 2**32 without seeing a single error. Given that in the original form, there was a 1 in 15 error rate, the odds that if there were any errors with the "fudged" algorithm, that I have not detected 1 of them after 600 million trials, are so vanishingly small as to be ... well, very, very unlikely. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In reply to Re^5: Split range 0 to M into N non-overlapping (roughly equal) ranges.
by BrowserUk
|
|