comment on

Ok, I've tried at length to explain my insanity elsewhere, and bored a lot of people into not listening with walls of text.

But were you listening? Maybe they tried to tell you that you reinvented the wheel:)

"Abstraction" is a general SW engineering principle, e.g. design by contract. Like mentioned above, you seemed to have reinvented templates. Take a look at one of the alternatives on cpan and see how it compares to what you did. Then convince me what you did is better.

Cheers

Harry

In reply to Re: RFC : Abstraction Markup by dHarry
in thread RFC : Abstraction Markup by simonodell

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


go ahead... be a heretic
	PerlMonks