Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?

Re: Re: RFC: new module r (or R)

by etcshadow (Priest)
on Mar 05, 2004 at 19:25 UTC ( #334332=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: RFC: new module r (or R)
in thread RFC: new module r (or R)

Interference with GetOpt* is a good point... Obviously, the only way such a collision could occur is if there were a directory named "--whatever" or "-w", etc. But it's still the sort of thing that shouldn't be allowed to interfere.

More reason, I think, to go with the -MR-type notation... as that would give more control (over when and where) to someone who was writing a script, or other module, but wanted to incorporate the @ARGV-recursion of this module.

Of course, another route would be to make it all under something like, and provide a stub that was just:

use RecursiveARGV;
Making perl -mr exactly the same as perl -MRecursiveARGV, but allowing people to do more fun stuff in their scripts like:
#!/usr/bin/perl require RecursiveARGV; # cleans @ARGV of any switches here, # leaving only files GetOpt(...); # now @ARGV becomes directory-magic RecursiveARGV->import();

Update: I changed midstream between referring to a more full-fledged module as and and things got a little tangled up.

------------ :Wq Not an editor command: Wq

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://334332]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (4)
As of 2017-01-19 02:25 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you watch meteor showers?

    Results (167 votes). Check out past polls.