Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Re: Geometric Optimisation and Perl

by tsee (Curate)
on Mar 27, 2004 at 16:04 UTC ( #340267=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Re: Geometric Optimisation and Perl
in thread Geometric Optimisation and Perl

Can't resist to give a quick answer to your question:
Being a physicist, I have indeed used Mathematica, though I generally prefer Maple for most stuff since I like the interface better. As you said, it is a question of the complexity of the optimization. I don't think you need the full power of Mathematica for this, though I haven't thought it through. If it's an If I recall correctly, the first reply in this thread pointed to a good, scientific discussion of the subject.
The reason I pointed at those Math:: modules was because before engaging in hairy XS/Inline::C library wrapping, it's probably a better idea to try with what's availlable already. If that's not good enough by a small margin, it's probably a better idea to extend what's on CPAN than to roll one's own. That doesn't mean I consider Mathematica an inadequate tool for the job.

Steffen


Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Geometric Optimisation and Perl
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Geometric Optimisation and Perl
by Vautrin (Hermit) on Mar 27, 2004 at 17:04 UTC

    You're right that if it's possible to solve the problem without using Mathematica, XS / Inline::C library wrapping, it is better to try what's available. However, I figured that I would put it out there, so that OP would know that there are other options if the problem gets complex enough.

    I'm a big fan of Perl, but to be honest, not every problem is right for it. If the OP can get a more elegant solution by using a technical computing platform like Matlab, or Mathematica (and if they can afford to), he or she may want to. However, if the OP has a reason to use Perl -- perhaps to interface with a CGI script or already existing Tk/Perl application? -- the option is there.

    I would also like to point out, that the OP doesn't have to use XS to return the values. If the solution is significantly complex, or the number is to a precision bigger then you can return via XS, or there is another reason to make XS a bad solution, it is possible to send the result over a Unix domain socket or a TCP/IP connection, or through a database, or put it in a file, or any of a number of possible solutions. Sometimes the best way to use a program is via a system() call that invokes a program that sends the data back to the program via a Unix domain socket. Of course, you're still going to have to roll your own protocol, but I figured I would put it out there so that the OP can decide what is best for his/her needs.


    Want to support the EFF and FSF by buying cool stuff? Click here.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://340267]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (9)
As of 2015-07-29 22:28 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (269 votes), past polls