Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Estimating continuous functions

by hardburn (Abbot)
on Mar 29, 2004 at 14:22 UTC ( #340613=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Estimating continuous functions

Not having as strong a math background as I would like, I jump straight to a (possibly) practical solution: Neural Nets. It'll probably either get close to the real function, or it'll generate a confused mass of code much like the one you say you have now :) If nothing else, it might be a fun diversion.

----
: () { :|:& };:

Note: All code is untested, unless otherwise stated


Comment on Re: Estimating continuous functions
Download Code
Re: Re: Estimating continuous functions
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 30, 2004 at 00:45 UTC
    Or write a Genetic Algorithm (using AI::Genetic for example). Use a variety of functions as genes from which to build the genome of each 'individual'. The fitness test could use least squares.
    Problem with Neural Nets is they tend to be black boxes, though they might approximate your function they can't easily tell you what it is. Unless you implement a *really* big one that can parse and generate natural language as well as your function ;)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://340613]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-07-25 02:13 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (167 votes), past polls