Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re: (zdog) Re: (4) Estimating continuous functions

by tilly (Archbishop)
on Mar 30, 2004 at 17:17 UTC ( #341027=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to (zdog) Re: (4) Estimating continuous functions
in thread Estimating continuous functions

First of all for the general case, some back of the envelope estimates suggest to me that 1/distance is a better weighting than my original 1/distance**2.

As for your specific function, you may find it worthwhile to do some transformations first. For instance if I understand your description, then log(F(x,y,z)) is roughly of the form K*log(log(x))/(y*z). So log(F(x,y,z))*y*z/log(log(x)) is roughly a constant.

This is good because the estimator that I provided is going to give the best results when approximating functions that are roughly constant. (Cubic splines, etc, give very good results at approximating functions that locally look like low-degree polynomials.) And estimating this "rough constant" gives you (after reversing the above calculation) your original function F.

In general a judicious application of general theory and specific knowledge about your situation is more effective than abstract theory by itself...


Comment on Re: (zdog) Re: (4) Estimating continuous functions

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://341027]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (13)
As of 2015-07-02 08:49 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (31 votes), past polls