Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

Re: (zdog) Re: (4) Estimating continuous functions

by tilly (Archbishop)
on Mar 30, 2004 at 17:17 UTC ( #341027=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to (zdog) Re: (4) Estimating continuous functions
in thread Estimating continuous functions

First of all for the general case, some back of the envelope estimates suggest to me that 1/distance is a better weighting than my original 1/distance**2.

As for your specific function, you may find it worthwhile to do some transformations first. For instance if I understand your description, then log(F(x,y,z)) is roughly of the form K*log(log(x))/(y*z). So log(F(x,y,z))*y*z/log(log(x)) is roughly a constant.

This is good because the estimator that I provided is going to give the best results when approximating functions that are roughly constant. (Cubic splines, etc, give very good results at approximating functions that locally look like low-degree polynomials.) And estimating this "rough constant" gives you (after reversing the above calculation) your original function F.

In general a judicious application of general theory and specific knowledge about your situation is more effective than abstract theory by itself...


Comment on Re: (zdog) Re: (4) Estimating continuous functions

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://341027]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-08-22 04:42 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The best computer themed movie is:











    Results (146 votes), past polls