Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Why breaking can() is acceptable

by hardburn (Abbot)
on Apr 06, 2004 at 14:32 UTC ( #342935=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Why breaking can() is acceptable
in thread Why breaking can() is acceptable

how do you handle syntactic-sugar methods that are instance-specific?

That is something that probably comes down to a case-by-case basis, so I don't want to give any hard rules on it. What I do want is to stop people from using AUTOLOAD to handle accessors/mutators when other solutions are available. This seems to be the most common use of AUTOLOAD, and it needs to stop. (Please direct flames twards tchrist :)

----
: () { :|:& };:

Note: All code is untested, unless otherwise stated


Comment on Re: Re: Re: Why breaking can() is acceptable
Download Code
Re: Re: Re: Re: Why breaking can() is acceptable
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Apr 06, 2004 at 14:33 UTC
    What about soft rules? :-)

    ------
    We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.

    Then there are Damian modules.... *sigh* ... that's not about being less-lazy -- that's about being on some really good drugs -- you know, there is no spoon. - flyingmoose

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://342935]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (10)
As of 2015-07-02 05:44 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (29 votes), past polls