Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change

Re: Re: Why breaking can() is acceptable

by tilly (Archbishop)
on Apr 06, 2004 at 15:03 UTC ( #342950=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Why breaking can() is acceptable
in thread Why breaking can() is acceptable

And that is exactly what I was referring to with my comments on "typeglobbing closures instead of AUTOLOAD".

I also usually don't wrap it in a BEGIN block. In the context of a module, there is no real reason to wrap it in a BEGIN block, because the module itself is wrapped in an implicit BEGIN block. Otherwise I prefer to not try to specify BEGIN ordering unless absolutely needed, instead specify ordering of events as simple as I can arrange. (But that was an old discussion with tye.)

  • Comment on Re: Re: Why breaking can() is acceptable

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://342950]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (12)
As of 2016-10-26 14:05 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How many different varieties (color, size, etc) of socks do you have in your sock drawer?

    Results (341 votes). Check out past polls.