Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

2Re: Why breaking can() is acceptable

by jeffa (Chancellor)
on Apr 06, 2004 at 15:15 UTC ( #342957=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Why breaking can() is acceptable
in thread Why breaking can() is acceptable

I think this is more like hiring a number of people and assigning each one a task, and then following each one around to make sure they do it right. That's right: micromanagement.

For better or worse, i am with tilly on this one. If i need that kind of Bondage and Discipline, i will code in Java and not Perl. (And i don't code Java ;))

jeffa

L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L--
-R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR
B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B--
H---H---H---H---H---H---
(the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)


Comment on 2Re: Why breaking can() is acceptable

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://342957]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (7)
As of 2015-07-02 04:38 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (27 votes), past polls