Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

2Re: Why breaking can() is acceptable

by jeffa (Chancellor)
on Apr 06, 2004 at 15:15 UTC ( #342957=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Why breaking can() is acceptable
in thread Why breaking can() is acceptable

I think this is more like hiring a number of people and assigning each one a task, and then following each one around to make sure they do it right. That's right: micromanagement.

For better or worse, i am with tilly on this one. If i need that kind of Bondage and Discipline, i will code in Java and not Perl. (And i don't code Java ;))

jeffa

L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L--
-R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR
B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B--
H---H---H---H---H---H---
(the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)


Comment on 2Re: Why breaking can() is acceptable

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://342957]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (10)
As of 2014-07-25 21:23 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (175 votes), past polls