in reply to Re: Re: Re: Why do we say the =~ operator "binds"?
in thread Why do we say the =~ operator "binds"?
I just grepped my source repository to see where I'd written that and I couldn't find it. The general case I'd thought of where it was annoying or inconvenient to the narrative to give the topicalized variable a name. I can't find an example (though I did just find a code-typo in Switch.pm where ~= was said instead of =~).
for ( ... ) { $foo = /.../; }
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we say the =~ operator "binds"?
by William G. Davis (Friar) on Apr 18, 2004 at 22:11 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom