Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we say the =~ operator "binds"?

by William G. Davis (Friar)
on Apr 18, 2004 at 22:11 UTC ( #346161=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we say the =~ operator "binds"?
in thread Why do we say the =~ operator "binds"?

It's *almost never* annoying or inconvenient to the narrative to give topicalized variables names.

The loop is the discussion and the alias variable is what's being talked about. It's the topic--the subject--and it has a name, even if you don't feel like giving it one. And using "for" when you really mean "foreach" element in some list doesn't help anyone either (again, when the code's for public consumption, not when it's just for you.)


Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we say the =~ operator "binds"?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://346161]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (5)
As of 2014-07-29 02:14 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (211 votes), past polls