Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: VarStructor 1.0

by Wassercrats
on May 01, 2004 at 18:54 UTC ( #349664=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to VarStructor 1.0

VarStructor 1.0 actually has more negative votes than VarStructor, which was way less complete and had a bug (which was never mentioned by anyone).

The voting system is a joke.


Comment on Re: VarStructor 1.0
Re: Re: VarStructor 1.0
by Anonymous Monk on May 02, 2004 at 05:36 UTC
    The voting system is a joke

    Actually, the voting system is a feeling of the Monastery about the proposed node. It is not intended to be perfect, but for the ones who can listen, it's a good device.

    Your problem is that you don't listen.

    This previous node was downvoted just because it was a bad idea.

    This one was downvoted more because:

    • It is still a bad idea
    • Despite being told not to do it, you insist on wanting to publish it to CPAN.
    • When people explains to you what was wrong with your code, you again don't listen.

    Basically, the situation is as follows: you come here and publish your code. This is an implicit request for feedback. People offer you feedback, saying that your code is bad. Instead of listening to the sound advice, you criticize the very system that you wanted advice from. How could you possibly be surprised if you are downvoted? Grow up!

      Please be more specific.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://349664]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (10)
As of 2014-07-30 02:14 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (229 votes), past polls