Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: "freak" and recent threads

by mirod (Canon)
on May 05, 2004 at 19:52 UTC ( #350901=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: "freak" and recent threads
in thread "freak" and recent threads

Those questions belong on comp.infosystems... sorry, wrong forum ;--(

Seriously, those questions really seem to boil down to "how can I artificially inflate the hit count on a web site without being caught?". The poster never gave a satisfying explanation to why they wanted to do this. Or any explanation at all. I /msg'ed feak privately and got no answer. I imagine other monks have done the same, and suspect that if they had received an answer they would have said so.

So the signs are really, _really_, pointing to an annoying individual engaged in at least non-ethical, and possibly illegal, activities. I would love for freak to explain why they need this though.


Comment on Re: Re: Re: "freak" and recent threads
Re: Re: Re: Re: "freak" and recent threads
by eXile (Priest) on May 05, 2004 at 21:21 UTC

    I'm also curious for the reasons of his questions, so I asked him this question in his last thread. Anyone who is 'on trial' should at least get the opportunity to defend himself, don't they?

    If his reasons are valid, I owe him an apology, but up until now freak has used his right to remain silent. To me that is not a good sign.

    If any new dubious questions are asked by him I urge everybody to first ask him why he wants to know, so other Perlmonks that don't know of these suspicions are made aware of them. We might all be involved in some kind of criminal/unethical activity if we don't.

Re: Re: Re: Re: "freak" and recent threads
by fizbin (Chaplain) on May 08, 2004 at 01:36 UTC

    My sincere hope is that freak is new to programming in general, and also new to ethical thinking about computer/internet usage in general. I further hope that the distinct disapproval of people who present themselves as a potential online peer group (i.e. perlmonks) will cause some growth in this area.

    I admit that this hope may be a long shot, but people do grow and change. Anyone who was ethically the same person at 25 as they were at 15 was either a 15-yr-old saint or a 25-yr-old jerk.

    With this in mind, it might be time to stop downvoting his posts. No one needs -145 XP; further slapping may just cause him to defensively disregard any opinion from anyone on perlmonks as the result of a bunch of elitist snobs.

    -- @/=map{[/./g]}qw/.h_nJ Xapou cets krht ele_ r_ra/ map{y/X_/\n /;print}map{pop@$_}@/for@/
Re^4: "freak" and recent threads
by DrHyde (Prior) on Jun 04, 2004 at 20:23 UTC
    /msging is broken on this site, probably by design. I'd been using it for over a year before I even knew it existed, and I still don't know (nor, I confess, care) how to use it. That someone doesn't reply doesn't mean a thing.
      /msg seems to work fine for me. The How do I use this? link not too far bellow where your messages show up explains it.
        You assume that people have the chatterbox turned on. I don't. If I want to chat, there's IRC, or there's email. The function for sending another monk a private message is broken, because there is no way of getting at it other than through turning on a feature that many have no interest in.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://350901]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (5)
As of 2014-11-26 01:37 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My preferred Perl binaries come from:














    Results (160 votes), past polls