Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask

Re: The (futile?) quest for an automatic paraphrase engine

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on May 17, 2004 at 09:20 UTC ( #353899=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The (futile?) quest for an automatic paraphrase engine
in thread The (futile?) quest for an automatic paraphrase engine

It would be equally valid to assume that John was not in the photograph.

The man in the picture is the man with the telescope that John saw.

Of course, if the only context is a photograph, then a perl based text manipulating program won't have access to that context, so saying that the program failed to disambiguate the text is wrong.

Another human being who cannot see the photograph would be similarly unable to perform the impossible.

Examine what is said, not who speaks.
"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"Think for yourself!" - Abigail
  • Comment on Re: The (futile?) quest for an automatic paraphrase engine

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: The (futile?) quest for an automatic paraphrase engine
by kiat (Vicar) on May 17, 2004 at 11:08 UTC

    Interestingly, I did a small test on Microsoft Grammatic Check a few years ago to see how it works. I gave the following two sentences:

    (1) He drives to work yesterday.

    (2) Mary was attacked by a dog.

    No complaints about (1) but an advisory to change (2) to the active.

    I didn't have to do any more test :)

    I don't have the latest Microsoft Word now. Otherwise, I'll be curious to see if things have changed.

      It's all an evil conspiracy to keep English class in public school. I say "good!" for defective grammar checkers, all the sooner than can be removed. Maybe we can teach kids to do Algebra without graphing calculators too...

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://353899]
[Discipulus]: a solution would be disabiltate sig as default and let users to show them
[karlgoethebier]: now it's getting weird...
[GotToBTru]: 'getting'?
[Discipulus]: why karlgoethebier ?
[GotToBTru]: ugh .. what's the term for comparing versions of an algorithm to determine which is most efficient?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (16)
As of 2017-06-22 12:46 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How many monitors do you use while coding?

    Results (519 votes). Check out past polls.