Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Tripwire tests and future-proofing

by dws (Chancellor)
on May 25, 2004 at 16:41 UTC ( #356279=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Tripwire tests and future-proofing
in thread Tripwire tests and future-proofing

This is a trivial "bug" to fix, you simply enclose the map in %{{}}

Yeah. That's the problem with late-night transcriptions where proprietary bits need to be discarded. Fixed above.

  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Tripwire tests and future-proofing

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://356279]
help
Chatterbox?
[moritz]: seems there's a size limit for hostenum, and the error message just sucks
[vrk]: None, other than the location of the error: auto/NetAddr/IP/ _splitref.al
[vrk]: Aha, there's a reference to "bug report 82719" in NetAddr/IP.pm's sub _splitref.
[moritz]: wow, that's their idea of an "improved error message"
[moritz]: how about "This network is too large to enumerate all host addresses." or so?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (9)
As of 2017-04-25 07:39 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    I'm a fool:











    Results (449 votes). Check out past polls.