Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Open to debate on mixins and traits.

by stvn (Monsignor)
on Jun 02, 2004 at 19:49 UTC ( #359689=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Open to debate on mixins and traits.
in thread Open to debate on mixins and traits.

I was kind of limiting my thoughts to Perl:)
What about Aspect?

There is (are?) concrete implementation(s) of AOP (Aspectj and ?). I don't know how they are implemented, but I suspect that it basically comes down to essentially the same as mixins/traits in that extra methods get attached directly or indirectly to the vtable.

My (also limited) understanding of AOP is that it is not really just for object composition (as mix-ins/traits are), and therefore not directly related to OOP (although you rarely see AOP without OOP).

As far as AOP implementation, it actually looks to me like Aspect is full of symbol-table madness, while AspectJ has an Aspect weaver which is essentially a compiler pre-processor.

Creating a new language that incorporated the cross-cutting concern (in AOP speak) as part of the core language would be a sixth.
Isn't that exactly what the :trait notation of P6 is doing?
Similar, but not exactly. But again, my understanding of both is limited, but I don't see them as being exactly the same.

-stvn


Comment on Re: Re: Re: Open to debate on mixins and traits.
Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://359689]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (11)
As of 2014-07-23 10:09 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (139 votes), past polls