Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery

Re^2: Regrettable module names

by biosysadmin (Deacon)
on Jul 04, 2004 at 09:29 UTC ( #371692=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Regrettable module names
in thread Regrettable module names

I like this one. The only thing that I think you could possibly do better would be to imply the Protocol somehow and just name it Acme::Remote::Strangulation. Also, some code examples in the perldoc would be nice too. :)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Regrettable module names
by TStanley (Canon) on Jul 04, 2004 at 16:54 UTC
    Thank you for the suggestions :-) I will put them in my To-Do list for the module.

    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing -- Edmund Burke
Re^3: Regrettable module names
by ChemBoy (Priest) on Jul 06, 2004 at 16:05 UTC

    Shouldn't it be Acme::Strangulation::Remote? Seems more in keeping with the general-to-specific idea of name spaces...

    If God had meant us to fly, he would *never* have given us the railroads.
        --Michael Flanders

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://371692]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (7)
As of 2018-01-16 10:04 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How did you see in the new year?

    Results (176 votes). Check out past polls.