http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=371881


in reply to Regrettable module names

This one's not my own, but (sorry Schwern):
Ima::DBI
It's a subclass of DBI that gives it a few extra methods, and it's widely deployed now thanks to the popularity of Class::DBI.

Hello, I'm a DBI.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Regrettable module names
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jul 05, 2004 at 14:05 UTC

    Totally agree. Should have been I'm::a::DBI :)


    Examine what is said, not who speaks.
    "Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
    "Think for yourself!" - Abigail
    "Memory, processor, disk in that order on the hardware side. Algorithm, algoritm, algorithm on the code side." - tachyon

      Quite right, since "Ima" means "Mother" in Hebrew (well, okay, Aramaic, but let's not get carried away), and I don't think it's supposed to be the mother of all DBI modules...

      --
      edan

      That'll work great until you use some syntax-highlighting editor that mistakes it for a quoted string :)

      You++ anyway, for finding an almost-good use of the single-quote package seperator.

      ----
      send money to your kernel via the boot loader.. This and more wisdom available from Markov Hardburn.

        Don't forget about another great use of the apostrophe namespace separator.
        ------------ :Wq Not an editor command: Wq
        This already happens whenever I use `, #, ", and ' in regexps. What editor are you using that it correctly parses perl? Both the cperl-perl and perl-perl major modes of emacs get this sort of stuff wrong all the time.