Re^3: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing)

Comment on Re^3: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing)
Re^4: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing) by Wassercrats on Sep 01, 2004 at 07:45 UTC
I want them to be as protected from copying and viewing (the source code) as possible for a computer program, and that's not possible with Perl 5 scripts.	[reply]
Re^5: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing) by Anonymous Monk on Sep 01, 2004 at 08:02 UTC
Yes it is	[reply]
Re^6: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing) by Wassercrats on Sep 01, 2004 at 19:00 UTC
Is not. Real bytecode ads an extra level of protection. It's more difficult to understand.	[reply]
Re^7: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing) by Ven'Tatsu (Deacon) on Sep 01, 2004 at 20:01 UTC
Re^8: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing) by Wassercrats on Sep 01, 2004 at 20:23 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^8: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing) by osfameron (Hermit) on Sep 02, 2004 at 08:33 UTC
Re^5: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing) by Anonymous Monk on Sep 01, 2004 at 18:20 UTC
Having reviewed VarStructor, I think you need a way to protect your code from being executed as well. Technically speaking, I think deletion fulfills both of our requirements of your code.	[reply]
Re^6: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing) by Wassercrats on Sep 01, 2004 at 18:59 UTC
Your reply is at Re: VarStructor 1.0.	[reply]