Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask

Re: The Great Computer Language Shootout

by QM (Parson)
on Sep 23, 2004 at 18:59 UTC ( #393296=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to The Great Computer Language Shootout

I didn't see any explicit mention of this idea, but it's obvious in the other replies...

Why not start your own site which adds the criteria for Development Time, possibly broken down into Coding Time and Debugging Time? This should be weighted something like 10% or 1% of the CPU weighting (insert arguments for and against here).

And the various points about using native idioms to solve the same problem lead me to think that a Native Idiom score would be telling as well. Sure, by forcing all entries to avoid native idiom advantages, it shows what the performance of a generic, doesn't-fit-into-a-native-idiom algorithm would do. But it also avoids showcasing what programming areas each language excels at (performance wise). Add in the native idiom measure, and development time becomes apparent and interesting too.

Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of

  • Comment on Re: The Great Computer Language Shootout

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://393296]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (4)
As of 2018-05-28 03:58 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?