http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=394644


in reply to Re^2: What's your prefered revision control system?
in thread What's your prefered revision control system?

Actually I've been trying to impliment some form of RCS since I started working (as a programmer) but haven't got the okay yet (got to love management). However, the new project I'm working on might give me an excuse to use some RCS (CVS proably) - here's hoping.

Update: I get to try RCS, CVS, and Aegis on a new test server, if this poll is still active I'll post which is my fav. of these three

"Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - I think that I think, therefore I think that I am." Ambrose Bierce

  • Comment on Re^3: What's your prefered revision control system?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: What's your prefered revision control system?
by roju (Friar) on Oct 15, 2004 at 21:39 UTC
    Who needs management permission? If you're the only developer, concurrent editing isn't a big problem, so just install something locally on your machine.

    I was the sole perl guy at my work this past summer, so I installed TortoiseSVN (a Windows Subversion package) on my first day and used it locally while I was there. Simple as hell to use, and had nothing to worry about when I accidently deleted important files. Plus, it made versioning so much easier, just use the SVN version. :)

    Update: looks like I'm preaching to the converted. Congratz