Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

RE: RE: RE: A discriminating sort (and some damned lies)

by Fastolfe (Vicar)
on Nov 03, 2000 at 20:22 UTC ( #39840=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RE: RE: A discriminating sort (and some damned lies)
in thread A discriminating sort (and some damned lies)

Calling defined for a hash key doesn't create anything.

There is a subtle difference internally between exists and defined. With exists, all Perl has to do is see if there's an entry in the hash table for that item. With defined, that value has to be inspected:

Benchmark: timing 1000000 iterations of defined, exists... defined: 21 wallclock secs (21.36 usr + 0.00 sys = 21.36 CPU) exists: 19 wallclock secs (18.45 usr + 0.00 sys = 18.45 CPU)
Using code like this:
# %hash is a hash with values for one/two/tre/for sub t_exists { 1 if exists $hash{one}; 1 if exists $hash{two}; 1 if exists $hash{tre}; 1 if exists $hash{for}; 1 if exists $hash{xxx}; 1 if exists $hash{xxy}; 1 if exists $hash{xxz}; 1 if exists $hash{xyx}; } ...
Granted, that's a million iterations, and the difference is only a couple of seconds. Hardly worth arguing over, but it's just a difference in the way of thinking about hashes.. In my head, what I'm looking for is the presence of a certain key in the hash (exists), not whether or not the value for that key in the hash is defined. You're right that functionally they're equivalent in this case.


Comment on RE: RE: RE: A discriminating sort (and some damned lies)
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://39840]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-12-20 21:45 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (99 votes), past polls