Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight

Re: A Proposal for Additional Levels

by xorl (Deacon)
on Oct 27, 2004 at 15:13 UTC ( #403046=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to A Proposal for Additional Levels

Change is needed in the current system, but the proposal discussed is not really a change. All it does is increase the number of levels and amount of XP needed.

If anything it will exacerbate the problem we currently have -- lack of accountability. Until we know who is voting and how they are voting the system is too full of irresponsible people who just down vote posts for the fun of it. I am tired of seeing simple thank you posts or even very informative posts at -1 or lower.

On the other hand the proposal would make people think more about the system, want XP more, and maybe realize these downvoters must be dealt with.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://403046]
[Discipulus]: oh well we cant afford two monks fired in a day!
[LanX]: any news from tye ' s search?
[MidLifeXis]: Ugh - who else?
[Discipulus]: so the right term is 'gired'
[Discipulus]: look at ot by karl
Discipulus gired: adj the work position that stands between hired and fired..
LanX recommends inner immigration, work less hard and enjoy pay roll
[MidLifeXis]: ahh, yeah, didn't look through nodes yet today.
[erix]: haha
[MidLifeXis]: Ahh well, time to get back to it, so there isn't a reason to take that choice out of my hands :-)

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (14)
As of 2017-03-23 12:46 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?

    Results (286 votes). Check out past polls.