Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Perl 6 was released years ago

by Anonymous Monk
on Nov 02, 2004 at 10:04 UTC ( #404548=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Perl 6 was released years ago
in thread Perl 6 was released years ago

I cannot imagine anybody seriously using an 8 year old obsolete version of anything and not being in the tiniest of minorities.

There are lots of airplanes flying around that are older than 8 years. Trains are build to last 40 or more years (and they do).

What I can't believe is that people upgrade for the sake of upgrading. There's an old saying "if it ain't broken, don't fix it". New versions of software *do* break things, whether intentionally or not. And I have to say, many open source authors don't consider backwards compatibility as important as they should (if they'd paid more attention to it, it would help in getting corperations to use more open source software). Perl tries it best to be backwards compatible, but it isn't perfect.

Not everyone seems to realize the costs upgrading takes. Upgrading a single developer box isn't hard. But for numerous organizations, installing new, or upgrading existing software is a big deal. Banks, hospitals are air flight controllers don't just upgrade. They have long and rigorous testing procedures, including regression tests. Anything that breaks is a show-stopper until resolved. People working with the new or upgraded software may need re-training. This all costs money.

I think the computing world would benefit if eight year old software wasn't "obsolete" and would just run without problems.


Comment on Re^3: Perl 6 was released years ago

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://404548]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (4)
As of 2014-07-26 06:28 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (175 votes), past polls