Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling

Re: Considering nodes for re-titling

by Errto (Vicar)
on Jan 06, 2005 at 00:41 UTC ( #419780=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Considering nodes for re-titling

As a relatively recent arrival to Level 6: Friar I've noticed one particularly unhealthy pattern: requests to retitle SoPW nodes because the OP had some problem code but misunderstood where the problem is. In other words, the suggested title reflects the answers to the question, rather than the question itself as the OP understood it.

To me, the importance of this goes beyond respecting authorship. The reason for preserving such titles is that a future seeker with a similar problem is probably more likely to frame their query in the way the OP did than in what the responses reflected. Please take care not to change the meaning of titles in this way.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://419780]
[Corion]: A good weekstart to everybody!

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (2)
As of 2018-01-22 07:22 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How did you see in the new year?

    Results (232 votes). Check out past polls.