Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Considering nodes for re-titling

by Joost (Canon)
on Jan 06, 2005 at 18:40 UTC ( #420020=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Considering nodes for re-titling
in thread Considering nodes for re-titling

I agree. Removing the old title doesn't really serve a purpose unless it's abusive. Using "New title (was: old title)" or "New title (renamed from: old title)" seems like a good idea to me. And the Janitors can mangle abusive titles if they need to - "Why use perl (Was: perl *****)".


Comment on Re^2: Considering nodes for re-titling

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://420020]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-12-26 09:31 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (171 votes), past polls