Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?

Re (tilly) 1: Development of the Perl Monks Code of Conduct

by tilly (Archbishop)
on Nov 22, 2000 at 22:02 UTC ( #42984=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Development of the Perl Monks Code of Conduct

These rules are going to change over time.

I have mentioned before that I think we should borrow from the various wikis the idea of communally edited documents with change history (so that if someone messes up we can go back to the old version). Perhaps limit editing control on them to people above a certain level.

If you provide that then I am sure that needs like this particular document, better site documentation, better tutorials, etc would naturally be filled.

  • Comment on Re (tilly) 1: Development of the Perl Monks Code of Conduct

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re (tilly) 1: Development of the Perl Monks Code of Conduct
by arturo (Vicar) on Nov 22, 2000 at 23:04 UTC

    I like this, tho' complicated a a bit:

    Perhaps a Perlmonks wiki server? The pages could be periodically fetched and the relevant data formatted a la PM and displayed on

    Or a standard CVS server?

    Philosophy can be made out of anything. Or less -- Jerry A. Fodor

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://42984]
[shmem]: Discipulus: the <<>> operator is quite new, it is in perl5.24 for instance
[Discipulus]: ah! thanks shmem it works in strawberry 5.24
[shmem]: ah. Introduced in 5.22.0, see perl5220delta
[Discipulus]: if so the previous error is a bit misleading, anyway
[shmem]: well, previous to that << was always treated as the left-shift operator
[Eily]: or the here-doc operator
[Eily]: which is actually how it is parsed in this case

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (5)
As of 2017-07-21 09:03 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    I came, I saw, I ...

    Results (320 votes). Check out past polls.