Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked

Re^6: Keeping, and advancing in, your job

by leriksen (Curate)
on Mar 04, 2005 at 10:37 UTC ( #436521=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^5: Keeping, and advancing in, your job
in thread Keeping, and advancing in, your job

How do you 'know' it works ? It isnt tested.

10,000 lines is crap, and you'll never convince me otherwise. So lets just leave it at that.

And whats with the "wheres your first major module" shit ? I've written dozens of modules for my employers, most of which have 100% coverage in D::C. Furthermore I have contributed several patches for Class:DBI as part of the Phalanx effort, all derived from using D::C. I dont have to contribute to CPAN to have an opinion, cockhead. is better to be approximately right than precisely wrong. - Warren Buffet

  • Comment on Re^6: Keeping, and advancing in, your job

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Keeping, and advancing in, your job
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Mar 04, 2005 at 12:21 UTC
    Then the first part of refactoring is to bitchslap the original developer....

    I dont have to contribute to CPAN to have an opinion, cockhead.

    No, you don't. I used the example of my module on CPAN so as to:

    1. Demonstrate the issue isn't just with legacy code (I still actively maintain PDF::Template)
    2. Demonstrate the issue using my own personal code, saying everyone suffers from a lack of knowledge (the code was written over 2 years ago) and tuits (I have been focusing on other work and haven't written the 500+ tests needed)

    How do you 'know' it works ? It isnt tested.

    Wrong - it's "tested" over 25,000 times a day. In other words, I 'know' it works because that's what it does - work. I know the 60% that's covered works, too. I am not comfortable with that, so I will be adding more and better tests to the regression suite.

    Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing.
    Being unknowing, is not the same as being stupid.
    Expressing a contrary opinion, whether to the individual or the group, is more often a sign of deeper thought than of cantankerous belligerence.
    Do not mistake your goals as the only goals; your opinion as the only opinion; your confidence as correctness. Saying you know better is not the same as explaining you know better.

      Neither a flame nor flamebait,
      ... but seems to me that dc's "I 'know' it works...." can be a pretty good argument for hewing to the wisdom
                "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

      Bottom Line: This whole tangent re testing exposes a variety of worthwhile approaches... but the several bits of angry language and ad hominem comments between the OP and this point seem to me (yep, YMMV) unhelpful.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://436521]
[roboticus]: Maybe use a squarified tree map tool (first google hit I got: https://windirstat .net/)

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (8)
As of 2017-09-20 16:50 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    During the recent solar eclipse, I:

    Results (237 votes). Check out past polls.