Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery

Re^2: A bad shuffle

by Anonymous Monk
on Mar 21, 2005 at 10:04 UTC ( #441161=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: A bad shuffle
in thread A bad shuffle

Considering that shuffle and random_perm are called without arguments, and are hence shuffling empty lists, your benchmark doesn't show anything interesting. If you change the @_ in both subs to @cards, I get the following results:
              Rate random_perm     shuffle
random_perm 6796/s          --        -32%
shuffle     9955/s         46%          --
It may appear that shuffle is faster. But look what happens when we shuffle 52000 cards instead of 52:
            s/iter     shuffle random_perm
shuffle       1.02          --        -85%
random_perm  0.158        550%          --
It's well known that a shuffle based on splice doesn't scale, due to its quadratic behaviour.

Never use a splice based shuffle. For every millisecond you will gain if you shuffle a small list you'll pay a second when shuffling a large list.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://441161]
and the sunlight beams...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (11)
As of 2017-11-22 17:44 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    In order to be able to say "I know Perl", you must have:

    Results (327 votes). Check out past polls.