Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change

Re^2: A bad shuffle

by Anonymous Monk
on Mar 22, 2005 at 09:55 UTC ( #441408=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: A bad shuffle
in thread A bad shuffle

For those who are only sorting a deck of cards (a very popular subset of shuffling), this may be sufficient ;-)
Well, about all you gain is 50 microseconds. The 'shuffle' sub isn't significant smaller or easier to understand than 'random_perm'. They are both four lines of code, not counting lines consisting of just closing braces.

There isn't a real argument to not choose a solution that scales. If 50 microseconds are important to you, you should have used List::Util::scalar in the first place.

Comment on Re^2: A bad shuffle

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://441408]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (4)
As of 2015-11-29 07:29 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (748 votes), past polls