Re^2: Infinite JAPHs?

JAPH Golf: 32

print "Just Another Perl Hacker"
[download]

Admittedly, not very obfuscated ...

The intelligent reader will judge for himself. Without examining the facts fully and fairly, there is no way of knowing whether vox populi is really vox dei, or merely vox asinorum. -- Cyrus H. Gordon

Comment on Re^2: Infinite JAPHs? Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Infinite JAPHs? by domm (Chaplain) on Mar 31, 2005 at 07:52 UTC
31! `die"Just Another Perl Hacker\n"` Ok, in fact thats the same length (minus the space), but it has more 'features' (ends with a newline) :-) `-- #!/usr/bin/perl for(ref bless{},just'another'perl'hacker){s-:+-$"-g&&print$_.$/}` [download]	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: Infinite JAPHs? by kelan (Deacon) on Mar 31, 2005 at 20:34 UTC
Get one less character with all of the same features! `die"Just another Perl hacker "` [download] Just embed an actual newline into the string :) And actually, I think the usual rules don't count physical newlines, so you might see it as saving two characters.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: Infinite JAPHs? by domm (Chaplain) on Apr 01, 2005 at 07:33 UTC
Nice! `-- #!/usr/bin/perl for(ref bless{},just'another'perl'hacker){s-:+-$"-g&&print$_.$/}` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: Infinite JAPHs? by cog (Parson) on Mar 31, 2005 at 08:52 UTC
That's not a JAPH... the "A" and the "H" should be lowercased, and there's a comma or a newline (you get to choose which) missing from the end... Anyway, you could have ommited the space after the print... :-)	[reply]
Canonical JAPH (was Re^4: Infinite JAPHs?) by merlyn (Sage) on Mar 31, 2005 at 15:16 UTC
Good, I'm glad someone pointed that out. The canonical JAPH (as used by JAPH #0, namely me) produces precisely the string: `"Just another Perl hacker,"` [download] The comma comes from the fact that it was a sign-off at the end of my Usenet postings: blah blah blah blah blah print "Just another Perl hacker," (my normal dot-sig here) -- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.	[reply] [d/l]


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks