Re^3: in_array and skipping foreach

Isn't it faster to create a lookuptable next to your array? The value in the array will be the key in the lookup table (hash) with the value 0 or 1.

"We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on when it's necessary to compromise." - Larry Wall.

Comment on Re^3: in_array and skipping foreach

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: in_array and skipping foreach by VSarkiss (Monsignor) on Apr 13, 2005 at 14:59 UTC
Faster? Maybe. Doable? Definitely. I wasn't saying anything about better or worse, just pointing out the thinko in the parent node. Do not rebuke them with harsh words ... but rather lead them gently - with URLs - so that they may learn wisdom.	[reply]


The stupid question is the question not asked
	PerlMonks