Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re: How can grep search based on text or pattern based on user input?

by dchetlin (Friar)
on Dec 04, 2000 at 11:44 UTC ( #44757=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to How can grep search based on text or pattern based on user input?

`grep' in Perl is a misnomer; it's not inherently related to RExen. It should really be named `filter' or something similar. As such, using a bare variable as the `EXPR' in grep EXPR, LIST won't invoke the REx engine at all -- basically you're checking $searchtext for truth each time through the `LIST', which is most certainly not WYM.

My personal vote on this problem would be to provide the users a radio button group allowing them to choose whether they want to use Perl-based or standard search-engine searches, rather than trying to come up with a heuristic to determine if $searchtext is a Perl REx or just a term.

However, if you really want to do that, you'll want to look into `\Q' and `\E' to quote characters in a REx, rather than going to all that trouble (on line 4) to take care of metacharacters. I'm skeptical of the conversion from `*' to `\w*', but I suppose it's a sensible choice.

Rather than trying to build up a string that syntactically resembles a REx in Perl code, build the actual search pattern and then use it in the grep inside of a REx:

grep m/$searchtext/, <STUFF>

You might also want to look into qr// for a more efficient and cleaner way to build RExen programatically.

-dlc


Comment on Re: How can grep search based on text or pattern based on user input?
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://44757]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-07-31 01:04 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (242 votes), past polls