Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Why use strict is good, and barewords are bad

by merlyn (Sage)
on Apr 22, 2005 at 01:09 UTC ( #450250=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Why use strict is good, and barewords are bad
in thread Why use strict is good, and barewords are bad

I did indicate "in the days of perl3". Ampersandless subroutine calls weren't permitted way back when. Oh, how quickly you young'uns forget. {grin}

-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.

  • Comment on Re^2: Why use strict is good, and barewords are bad

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Why use strict is good, and barewords are bad
by jhourcle (Prior) on Apr 22, 2005 at 01:39 UTC

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://450250]
help
Chatterbox?
[Your Mother]: Someone had to say it. Better it came from tail.
[LanX]: Cat Mama!
[Your Mother]: Das right.
[Eily]: actually I forgot to provide the filename as a parameter
LanX it reeks.
[Your Mother]: You know what they say, the reeky wheel gets the best price at cheese market.
[Eily]: well I had to google translate that
[Eily]: let me inform you that the Dutch reek translate into the Czech páchnout
[Eily]: very useful default translation :P
[Eily]: BTW LanX, you should try typing a few random chars at the beginning of each message. This will prevent expansion :P

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (12)
As of 2017-03-27 16:48 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?



    Results (320 votes). Check out past polls.