|
|
| Perl: the Markov chain saw | |
| PerlMonks |
Re^3: Why use strict is good, and barewords are badby jhourcle (Prior) |
| on Apr 22, 2005 at 01:39 UTC ( #450256=note: print w/ replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
So barewords were introduced with the assumption subroutine calls would always have amperands -- and as hindsight works so well, we can all see what a bad assumption that was. (besides, you said 'Presuming no "use strict" (or the days of Perl3)')
... and I'm a newbie -- I learned from
In Section
Meditations
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||