Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Categorizing while approving

by kutsu (Priest)
on May 24, 2005 at 16:34 UTC ( #460077=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Categorizing while approving

We have categories, Seekers of Perl Wisdom, Meditation Discussion, Snippets, Obfu., etc.... If you wish the gods or pmdevils to make up a new list you'd be better served by giving reasons you thought it was incomplete and by making up a new list of categories you thought would work. The devs and gods and janitors and etc...are all volunteers (and have the appriciation of us all :), so asking for new features (whatever they maybe) without any or much work on your part make it more then likely your features will be shot down. As it stands I don't see that the current catagories need changing and the Move To: option and consideration (if it's been approved) seem to do an good job of getting nodes where they belong IMHO.

"Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - I think that I think, therefore I think that I am." Ambrose Bierce


Comment on Re: Categorizing while approving

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://460077]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (10)
As of 2014-12-20 01:03 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (94 votes), past polls