Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Categorizing while approving

by kutsu (Priest)
on May 24, 2005 at 16:34 UTC ( #460077=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Categorizing while approving

We have categories, Seekers of Perl Wisdom, Meditation Discussion, Snippets, Obfu., etc.... If you wish the gods or pmdevils to make up a new list you'd be better served by giving reasons you thought it was incomplete and by making up a new list of categories you thought would work. The devs and gods and janitors and etc...are all volunteers (and have the appriciation of us all :), so asking for new features (whatever they maybe) without any or much work on your part make it more then likely your features will be shot down. As it stands I don't see that the current catagories need changing and the Move To: option and consideration (if it's been approved) seem to do an good job of getting nodes where they belong IMHO.

"Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - I think that I think, therefore I think that I am." Ambrose Bierce


Comment on Re: Categorizing while approving

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://460077]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (8)
As of 2015-07-07 00:53 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (86 votes), past polls