Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Should I use Fields, InsideOuts, or Properties?

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Jul 06, 2005 at 12:01 UTC ( #472764=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Should I use Fields, InsideOuts, or Properties?
in thread Should I use Fields, InsideOuts, or Properties?

It's true that for both methods you need to code your constructors with a view to inheritance, but you have to do that when using fields also.

For the manually lock hash, you just have to test whether you are constructing a new instance or adding to an existing class, and in the latter case, unlock the hash, add you fields and re-lock. I admit that doesn't provide the _\w* is private behaviour.

For the blessed arrays, inheritance is messy. Hence my agreement with adrianh.

Basically, I have still to find the perfect combination for OO in Perl, but I don't have cause to make a great deal of use of it.


Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
The "good enough" maybe good enough for the now, and perfection maybe unobtainable, but that should not preclude us from striving for perfection, when time, circumstance or desire allow.


Comment on Re^3: Should I use Fields, InsideOuts, or Properties?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://472764]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (9)
As of 2014-07-22 10:19 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (109 votes), past polls