Regex vs. string

use strict;
use warnings;

my $current_index = 12;
my %columns = (
    'alpha'   => 1,
    'bravo'   => 2,
    'charlie' => 3,
    'delta'   => 4,
);

foreach my $k ( keys %columns ) {
    ( $current_index =~ $columns{$k} )
        ? print "$k matches\n"
        : print "$k does not match\n";
}

[download]

Comment on Regex vs. string Select or Download Code
Re: Regex vs. string by Enlil (Parson) on Jul 08, 2005 at 23:05 UTC
From perlop: Binary ``=~'' binds a scalar expression to a pattern match. Certain operations search or modify the string $_ by default. This operator makes that kind of operation work on some other string. The right argument is a search pattern, substitution, or transliteration. The left argument is what is supposed to be searched, substituted, or transliterated instead of the default $_. When used in scalar context, the return value generally indicates the success of the operation. Behavior in list context depends on the particular operator. See Regexp Quote-Like Operators for details. If the right argument is an expression rather than a search pattern, substitution, or transliteration, it is interpreted as a search pattern at run time. This can be less efficient than an explicit search, because the pattern must be compiled every time the expression is evaluated. Binary ``!~'' is just like ``=~'' except the return value is negated in the logical sense. -enlil	[reply]
Re: Regex vs. string by dave_the_m (Parson) on Jul 09, 2005 at 00:34 UTC
Note also that there are some subtle differences between a literal pattern, and a string used as a pattern, eg `$foo =~ /\ba\b/; # match the word "a" $foo =~ "\ba\b"; # match the three characters # backspace(\x08), "a", backspace` [download] update: changed bell to backspace as per TimToady's nitpick Dave.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^2: Regex vs. string by TimToady (Parson) on Jul 09, 2005 at 18:33 UTC
Mmm, actually, `\x08` is a backspace, to pick small nit. A `\a` would produce a bell (though it's not clear whether we'll carry that one over to Perl 6).	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re: Regex vs. string by kwaping (Priest) on Jul 09, 2005 at 15:03 UTC
In simpler terms, changing your `=~` to `==` will probably give you the results you were expecting. What's happening is that you're currently asking whether the character on the right is anywhere inside the string on the left. That's why alpha ("1") and bravo ("2") are successful when the string is "12".	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re: Regex vs. string by kp7 (Initiate) on Jul 10, 2005 at 16:28 UTC
from perlop manpage, about =~ operator : " If the right argument is an expression rather than a search pattern, substitution, or transliteration, it is interpreted as a search pattern at run time." -- regards piotr	[reply]


Just another Perl shrine
	PerlMonks

Regex vs. string

My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is: