Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: object oriented performance

by pg (Canon)
on Jul 17, 2005 at 04:12 UTC ( #475532=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to object oriented performance

This is a general issue higher than Perl. If you look at c and Java. c is much faster, although Java is getting faster over the years. But more and more people are now using Java, as it provides many benefits that c cannot. Just like other situations in life, there is taken and given you have to weigh.


Comment on Re: object oriented performance
Re^2: object oriented performance
by monarch (Priest) on Jul 17, 2005 at 04:20 UTC
    Noooo not Java..

    If someone is desperate enough to use object orientation to jump from C, then C++ would be a natural progression.

    Java and C, however, aren't really red apples and green apples.. ie the comparison between the two isn't really fair.

    Yes, C++ will slow down a wee bit, but going to Java is like going from flying aircraft to getting on a bicycle.. less chance of a major crash but much much slower..

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://475532]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (11)
As of 2014-07-24 20:09 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (167 votes), past polls