Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Scalar assignment with loop iterator considered bad?

by Adam (Vicar)
on Jul 22, 2005 at 19:30 UTC ( #477324=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Scalar assignment with loop iterator considered bad?

In this particular scenario, I'd use join(). Why write code to do what a native perl function will do for you? From a functionality perspective, letting join() do the work is probably better than concatenating a bunch of stuff in a loop. I'm sure you could come up with some example where looping was better - if, say, you were doing other stuff at the same time.
  • Comment on Re: Scalar assignment with loop iterator considered bad?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://477324]
help
Chatterbox?
[SwaJime]: Ran into an interesting piece of code today ...
[SwaJime]: select name,status, status2 from __ where status & status < 13 and status2 & 16 <> 16
[SwaJime]: I'm thinking that looks messed up. Sorry for OT ... but I know y'all are smart :-)
[SwaJime]: I expected items to not be selected if status was 0 ... but they were selected
[SwaJime]: any thoughts?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2017-08-22 17:59 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Who is your favorite scientist and why?



























    Results (338 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?