Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Differences between " " and ' '?

by polypompholyx (Chaplain)
on Jul 31, 2005 at 09:36 UTC ( #479697=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Differences between " " and ' '?
in thread Differences between " " and ' '?

D:\perl> perl -MBenchmark -e "timethese( 1000000, { doubles => sub { my $interpolated = \"pomperipossa\" }, singles => sub {my $uninterpolated = 'pomperipossa' } } )"

Gives these results:

Benchmark: timing 1000000 iterations of doubles, singles...

doubles:  0 wallclock secs ( 0.46 usr +  0.00 sys =  0.46 CPU) @ 2169197.40/s (n=1000000)

singles:  0 wallclock secs ( 0.45 usr +  0.00 sys =  0.45 CPU) @ 2217294.90/s (n=1000000)

So in this (highly unrealistic) case, singles seem infinitesimally faster. I use singles for things I think will be constant, and doubles only when I actually want interpolation. But this is nothing to do with alleged speed benefits, and everything to do with making my intentions clear.


Comment on Re^3: Differences between " " and ' '?
Select or Download Code
Re^4: Differences between " " and ' '?
by diotalevi (Canon) on Jul 31, 2005 at 23:10 UTC
    They are both 100% identical, internally. Any speed difference is the result of system noise and not because anything was measured. If you wished to measure the difference in compilation speed, use string-eval. That's the only time anything different will happen. I'm not going to run this code because any actual difference is going to be so infinitessimal that it will be undectable above system noise.

    use Benchmark; $bar = ''; timethese( 0, { doubles => sub { eval "$bar" }, singles => sub { eval '$bar' } } );

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://479697]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-07-28 06:26 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (189 votes), past polls