Re: problematic OO


There's more than one way to do things
	PerlMonks

Re: problematic OO

by greenFox (Vicar)

on Aug 03, 2005 at 09:01 UTC ( #480403=note: print w/ replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to problematic OO

I haven't run the code but it looks to me like your Mail class is looking for "SUBJECT" and "MESSAGE" and you are calling it with "subject" and "message"?

Any-way why aren't you using one of the good mail modules from CPAN? :-)

--
Murray Barton
Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Seek what they sought. -Basho

Comment on Re: problematic OO
Re^2: problematic OO by dhoss (Vicar) on Aug 03, 2005 at 09:03 UTC
Case shouldn't matter with named parameters...at least afaik... Well MIME::Lite was having problems on my system...but i'm going to try Mail::Sender out, does that count? :-D meh.	[reply]
Re^3: problematic OO by holli (Monsignor) on Aug 03, 2005 at 09:10 UTC
In that case you might find flexible command line mail sender (SMTP) insightful. holli, /regexed monk/	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: problematic OO by greenFox (Vicar) on Aug 03, 2005 at 09:11 UTC
Case shouldn't matter with named parameters...at least afaik... I don't think that is correct, at least that is not what I am seeing :) FWIW I use Tilly's code to check named parameters. -- Murray Barton Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Seek what they sought. -Basho	[reply]
Re^4: problematic OO by dhoss (Vicar) on Aug 03, 2005 at 19:41 UTC
Huh, apparently now. I should have listened!!! meh.	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://480403]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others wandering the Monastery: (14)

As of 2013-06-18 21:49 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

How many continents have you visited?

Results (632 votes), past polls