Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Maypole or PageKit?

by astroboy (Chaplain)
on Aug 19, 2005 at 19:54 UTC ( #485286=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Maypole or PageKit?

Catalyst is much more advanced down the development path than Maypole, but personally, I prefer CGI::Appplication because it's easier to learn, but the sheer volume of plugins being added in the last few months gives you a level of functionality on a par with Catalyst.

Catalyst has a steep learning curve IMHO, which is not helped by the documentation which seems a bit unstructured to me, but which obviously is sufficient for all those Catalyst programmers out there ... so I guess that it's personal taste.

A comparison between CGI::Application and Catalyst can be found here


Comment on Re: Maypole or PageKit?
Re^2: Maypole or PageKit?
by sri (Vicar) on Aug 20, 2005 at 01:25 UTC
    The documentation is no more that unstructured since we started the wiki.
    Most entertaining fact about the recent flood of CGI::App plugins is that they all mimic Catalyst features. ;)

    CGI::App has one big advantage over Catalyst, and thats it's minimalism, which makes it perform better on non persistent environments like CGI.
    But we have a new subproject called CGI::Catalyst for this special purpose. ;)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://485286]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (4)
As of 2014-08-02 05:33 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Who would be the most fun to work for?















    Results (54 votes), past polls