Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Subtle omission in perlop?

by davido (Archbishop)
on Aug 30, 2005 at 17:06 UTC ( #487843=perlquestion: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??
davido has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

The other day I quoted a couple of paragraphs out of perlop relating to how the 'stuff' within angle brackets gets parsed. Ever since then this has bugged me, as I believe it's a mistaken omission in perlop. Here are the paragraphs in question. I've underlined the sentence that's bothering me.

If what's within the angle brackets is neither a filehandle nor a simple scalar variable containing a filehandle name, typeglob, or typeglob reference, it is interpreted as a filename pattern to be globbed, and either a list of filenames or the next filename in the list is returned, depending on context. This distinction is determined on syntactic grounds alone. That means <$x> is always a readline() from an indirect handle, but <$hash{key}> is always a glob(). That's because $x is a simple scalar variable, but $hash{key} is not--it's a hash element.

One level of double-quote interpretation is done first, but you can't say <$foo> because that's an indirect filehandle as explained in the previous paragraph. (In older versions of Perl, programmers would insert curly brackets to force interpretation as a filename glob: <${foo}> . These days, it's considered cleaner to call the internal function directly as glob($foo), which is probably the right way to have done it in the first place.)

I think it should say...

...but you can't say <"$foo"> because...

The sentence is discussing what happend when you double-quote the contents of the angle bracket operator, but gives an example that isn't double-quoted. This is a subtle omission, but it damages the clarity of the assertion. Readers have to reflect on the gory details of quoting to realize the implications since the double-quotes are omitted from the example given.

Before I submit a perlbug report and patch I just wanted to confirm with the PerlMonks that I'm on the right channel. Comments welcomed...


Comment on Subtle omission in perlop?
Select or Download Code
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Subtle omission in perlop?
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Aug 30, 2005 at 17:39 UTC

    I think it's correct, and that it does the interpolation without the quotes being there. That's why it's surprising that <$foo> is a readline() call on the filehandle in $foo.

Re: Subtle omission in perlop?
by chester (Hermit) on Aug 30, 2005 at 17:36 UTC
    It looks OK to me the way it is. The way I interpret the underlined sentence is "Whatever is inside the <> is parsed like it was double-quoted so that you can do globs on the contents of variables among other things, but you can't do a glob using <$foo> because any time you use a simple scalar inside <>, it's interpreted as a filehandle." The point being, to glob $foo you need to use glob($foo) or <${foo}>.

    It says double-quote interpretation "is done first", it doesn't say anything about using literal double-quotes inside angle brackets. But I may be misinterpreting.

Re: Subtle omission in perlop?
by tlm (Prior) on Aug 30, 2005 at 18:06 UTC

    For example:

    DB<1> $dir = '.' DB<2> print "$_\n" while <$dir/*.c> ./bar.c ./baz.c ./foo.c

    the lowliest monk

Re: Subtle omission in perlop?
by chas (Priest) on Aug 30, 2005 at 17:47 UTC
    I thought that meant interpretation of double quotes inside (i.e. in the contents of) the variable (in the case that it is interpreted as a pattern to be globbed.) Perhaps I've just been confused, though...Hopefully, someone will clear this up in their reply.

      No, what that paragraph is meant to mean is that angle-brackets are a double-quote context. I.e., just as variables are interpolated in double quotes, so shall they be interpolated in angle brackets (except for the case of <$foo> which is always interpretted as a readline() on the $foo filehandle)

      In fact, I don't know why the docs don't say these very words.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: perlquestion [id://487843]
Approved by Old_Gray_Bear
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-08-02 12:53 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found
    past polls