For future reference I always downvote nodes about XP.
I don't always downvote all XP-related nodes, but I
do fairly consistently downvote nodes that complain
about various aspects of the XP system, nodes that
complain about people's voting behavior, and the
like, especially if the complaints are fundamentally
silly and the suggested changes are pointless. Is
there *anybody* who really wants to see a bunch
of nodes that just say, essentially, "I disagree",
so that the person posting it can -- the thing?
I downvote such nodes because they add nothing of
value to the community, and I'm tired of reading the
same old complaints over and over and over and over
and over and over again. I usually don't add another
comment, either, and almost didn't this time, because
I'm tired of being dragged into the same argument
again and again and again, the argument where I say
"complaining doesn't help your XP *or* your Perl
competency, discuss something useful instead" and
the complainer completely ignores any reasoning I
might provide and either continues to complain,
or goes off on some inane and bogus tangent about how
without complaining nothing would ever get fixed.
I don't want to have that conversation again.
If the person doing the downvoting feels that
explaining what is wrong with the node will benefit
anyone, then he's free to explain it. I personally
don't generally bother to downvote a node if I'm
going to reply, because I feel that in such cases
my reply can be more instructive than the downvote.
Put another way, if the node is good enough to warrant
an explanation, then it's often too good to downvote.
For instance, I usually don't downvote nodes that
make incorrect statements about how some feature of
the Perl language works; if someone hasn't already
done so, I reply and correct them; if someone has,
I upvote the correction. This is useful because it
helps people to understand Perl better. At the other
end of the scale, if the original node is just
trolling (e.g., "Perl sucks because it's unreadable
and slow, we should all use C instead"), a reply would
actively aggravate the matter ("feeding" the troll,
as it were) and a simple downvote is better.
Complaints about XP are somewhere in between, but
I tend to think they're closer to the troll than
the factual error.
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
Hi
"For future reference I always downvote nodes about XP."
For me this statement is perplexing given the argument you are making. Perhaps I am being silly and missing the point, but someone may post an interesting node on the topic of XP. Could you explain why you will take such a course of action given your point of view mentioned in this thread?
Thanks
Martin
Update: I typo'd danmcb's name in this post, I have resolved the mistake and fixed the formatting of the node. | [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |