Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris

Re: Re (tilly) 3 (comments): Supersplit

by jeroenes (Priest)
on Jan 02, 2001 at 18:31 UTC ( #49293=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re (tilly) 3 (comments): Supersplit
in thread Supersplit

After some CB discussion, tilly convinced me why the open was not such good magic. So I devoted a separate routine to that. The filehandle still is in the normal supersplit routine.

I personally vote for the split order of arguments, because people are more familiar with that. I think the variable length list can be coped with by the pop's. If that's unusual, so be it. I know that this order is mostly not a good idea.

Moreover, you can provide a limit option now. Because there is some magic involved, I doubled a function that doesn't try to find a limit parameter at the end.

The code has been posted more than enough now, so I hooked it up to my homenode. POD has been updated. Code has been tested.


I was dreaming of guitarnotes that would irritate an executive kind of guy (FZ)

Comment on Re: Re (tilly) 3 (comments): Supersplit

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://49293]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (10)
As of 2015-11-29 22:41 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (754 votes), past polls