Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re (tilly) 3 (comments): Supersplit

by jeroenes (Priest)
on Jan 02, 2001 at 18:31 UTC ( #49293=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re (tilly) 3 (comments): Supersplit
in thread Supersplit

After some CB discussion, tilly convinced me why the open was not such good magic. So I devoted a separate routine to that. The filehandle still is in the normal supersplit routine.

I personally vote for the split order of arguments, because people are more familiar with that. I think the variable length list can be coped with by the pop's. If that's unusual, so be it. I know that this order is mostly not a good idea.

Moreover, you can provide a limit option now. Because there is some magic involved, I doubled a function that doesn't try to find a limit parameter at the end.

The code has been posted more than enough now, so I hooked it up to my homenode. POD has been updated. Code has been tested.

Cheers,

Jeroen
I was dreaming of guitarnotes that would irritate an executive kind of guy (FZ)


Comment on Re: Re (tilly) 3 (comments): Supersplit

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://49293]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2015-07-03 03:26 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (48 votes), past polls