After some CB discussion, tilly convinced me why the open was not such
good magic. So I devoted a separate routine to that. The filehandle still
is in the normal supersplit routine.
in reply to Re (tilly) 3 (comments): Supersplit
in thread Supersplit
I personally vote for the split order of arguments, because people are more
familiar with that. I think the variable length list can be coped with by
the pop's. If that's unusual, so be it. I know that this order is mostly
not a good idea.
Moreover, you can provide a limit option now. Because there is some magic
involved, I doubled a function that doesn't try to find a limit parameter
at the end.
The code has been posted more than enough now, so I hooked it up to my
homenode. POD has been updated. Code has been tested.
I was dreaming of guitarnotes that would irritate an executive kind of guy (FZ)