Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

Re: RFC: Test::Cases -- Worth releasing?

by qq (Hermit)
on Sep 19, 2005 at 21:00 UTC ( #493304=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RFC: Test::Cases -- Worth releasing?

Release it. I just wrote very similar code for a bunch of xml filter modules. Take some xml, change it, spit it out.

I use a data directory with pairs of source/expected files (They get named test_name.a.source, test_name.a.expected, test_name.b.source, test_name.b.expected, ...) If there is failure, I write a failure file to the same directory, with a timestamp appended. This is for easy diffs. I'd definitely like to have separate source/expected files.

I still have individual .t files, so I can add tests that don't fit into the other structure.


Comment on Re: RFC: Test::Cases -- Worth releasing?
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://493304]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-07-05 03:37 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (60 votes), past polls