in reply to Re^2: Commonly accepted style guide?
in thread Commonly accepted style guide?
<RANT>Considering how twisted the syntax of C types gets as soon as pointers, functions and arrays are involved using typedefs is pure self-defense. Hey, what's the syntactical difference between the declaration of a function returning a pointer to int and a pointer to function returning int? Seems to me someone failed to envision the posibility of types more complex than an array to foo or pointer to foo.</RANT>
XML sucks. Badly. SOAP on the other hand is the most powerfull vacuum pump ever invented. |